Municipal Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan (MWSSMP)

Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan

Mulanay’s Journey Towards Clean Water and Sanitation: A Five-Part Analysis

Part 1: A Municipality on the Rise

The Municipality of Mulanay, a 1st class local government unit in Quezon province, has made strides in recent years thanks to financial assistance from the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG). From 2015 to 2017, these funds enabled the installation of Level I and II water systems, marking a positive step forward. Despite existing concerns about climate change and an aging infrastructure, the Local Government aims to implement improvements to its Level III water system.

Part 2: Challenges Remain

Despite these advancements, Mulanay still faces significant challenges in water access and sanitation. According to the DILG’s Integrated Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (iWASH) Investment Planning Tool, a concerning percentage of households lack access to safe water, while others struggle with untreated water quality. Similarly, the sanitation sector requires improvement, with a substantial portion of households lacking access to proper facilities.

Part 3: Beyond Households: Addressing Wider Needs

The lack of safe water and sanitation extends beyond individual homes, impacting public institutions like schools, evacuation centers, parks, and even the cemetery. These facilities lack readily available safe water and improved sanitation, posing potential health risks. Furthermore, aging water pipelines and inadequate drainage systems exacerbate the situation, particularly during typhoons and landslides.

Part 4: Health Consequences

The inadequate water and sanitation conditions contribute to the prevalence of waterborne diseases like diarrhea, pneumonia, dengue fever, and others. These illnesses lead to increased morbidity and mortality within the municipality, highlighting the urgency of addressing these issues.

Part 5: Charting a Course for Change

Recognizing these challenges, Mulanay’s key planners, functionaries, and stakeholders have collaborated to develop the Municipal Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan (MWSSMP). This plan leverages data from various sources, including the Municipal Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the iWASH tools, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current situation. It proposes interventions, investment strategies, and solutions to achieve the ultimate goal: by 2030, all Mulanay residents will have access to safe water, improved sanitation, and a healthy, clean environment.

This five-part analysis summarizes the key points of the text, highlighting the challenges and aspirations of Mulanay as it embarks on its journey towards a more sustainable and healthy future.

Background

Deprivation of access to safe drinking water and improved sanitation is a pressing challenge in the Philippines.  Based on the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2017-2022 and the Philippine Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan (2019-2030) around 14.5 percent of the families still no access to safe water supply, and 5.9 percent of the households have access to basic sanitary toilet facilities.  Disparities in access are found to be more pronounced between rural and urban areas, and between poor and non-poor households.  The Philippines has committed to contribute in attaining the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) particularly on SDG No. 6 Ensuring Clean Water and Sanitation for All by year 2030.

MWSSMP Planning Framework

The MWSSMP planning framework is generally based on the objectives, policies and strategies outlined in the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2017-2022 and the Philippine Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan (PWSSMP).  The PWSSMP serves as the national action plan to achieve universal access to safe, sufficient, affordable, and sustainable water supply, hygiene, and sanitation by 2030. 

Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA)

The MWSSMP was prepared following the Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA) to planning.  It is guided primarily by the principle that development programs and policies must aim for the greater realization of human rights, and that the process of development programs must be guided by human rights principles and standards.

This approach is centered on the relationship between Government, as the primary duty bearer, and the people, as rights holders, and works towards developing the capacities of rights holders to claim their rights as well as duty bearers to fulfill their obligations.  It emphasizes that development must not only focus on outcomes but also on the processes of realizing these outcomes.  The minimum desirable outcomes refer to human rights standards or normative core elements while the processes pertain to human rights principles.

Normative Elements on the Right to Water and Sanitation

The HRBA to water and sanitation has six normative core elements that act as standards against which the efforts of Government and development agencies to realize access to water and sanitation can be measured and assessed.

  • Water and sanitation availability: Quantity has to be sufficient on a continuous basis to meet basic human needs. There should be sufficiency of sanitation facilities and services and increase access to “Improved Sanitation”.
  • Water and sanitation facilities quality: Water must be safe and acceptable. Sanitation facilities must be hygienically safe and properly constructed.
  • Water and sanitation accessibility: Water and sanitation facilities must be within safe physical reach. Sensitive to the needs of women, disabled, children and elderly.
  • Water and sanitation service affordability: Water and sanitation services must be affordable and should not create an adverse impact on households’ ability to pay for other basic needs.
  • Sanitation acceptability: Sanitation facilities have to be culturally appropriate.

HRBA as Applied to Water and Sanitation

The human rights principles integrated into the planning framework include:

(a)  Universality and indivisibility:   it is a basic human right of all persons to have access to sustainable potable water and acceptable sanitation.

(b) Participation and inclusion:  Active, free, and meaningful participation of stakeholders is basic human right and a fundamental operational principle of any development initiative.

(c) Equality   and   non-discrimination:   Everybody   are   entitled   to   human   rights   without discrimination of any form, such as color, sex, ethnicity, age, language, religion, political affiliation, social origin, disability, property, or birth, among others.

(d) Accountability and rule of law:   HRBA underscores that Government is responsible and answerable for the realization of rights to water and sanitation.

(e)  Inter-dependence and Inter-relatedness:  The realization of one right often depends, wholly or in part, upon the realization of others.

The above human rights standards and principles to water and sanitation was used to address the causes and obstacles why individuals and communities do not enjoy their rights.  This approach helps identify those who are left out in the development process; prepare plans of actions and interventions   that   are   more   responsive   and   sustainable; and   enhance   accountability   and transparency through participation and partnerships.

Recommendation to address the iWASH Issues and Challenges

Ensuring safe water and sanitation for all is crucial for public health and well-being. However, insufficient access remains a significant challenge. To overcome this, the Mulanay Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan (MWSSMP) proposes key strategies:

1. Increased Financial Support:

  • Implementing the MWSSMP requires substantial funding. Adhering to the iWASH Investment Plan can help secure necessary resources to achieve the 2030 target.

2. A Healthy and Progressive Community:

  • The goal is to create a healthy and progressive community with improved water supply, sanitation, and hygiene facilities. This will enhance residents’ lives and promote environmental well-being.

3. Effective Monitoring and Evaluation:

  • Regular monitoring and evaluation are crucial to address potential issues such as lack of political will, administrative changes, substandard materials, and non-compliance with sanitation standards. This ensures successful implementation of the MWSSMP’s Public-Private Agreements (PPAs).

4. Investment Strategies and Private Partnerships:

  • Exploring alternative funding approaches and workable Private-Public Partnerships (PPPs) with water companies is recommended. Feasibility studies, public hearings, and sustainable development practices must be prioritized for project viability.

5. Utilizing Surface Water and Treatment Systems:

  • The private sector proposes using river water as a primary source alongside Water Treatment Clarifier Systems capable of producing 2000 m3/day of clean water in problematic areas. This project is planned for Sitio Agsayan, Barangay Latangan, near the Mulanay River System.
WATER SYSTEM SURFACE TREATMENT PROJECT
Water System TypeWater Treatment Clarifier System / Level III
Desired Water Production2.0 Million liters/day or 2000 m3/day
Number of Consumers20000 Person / 4000 HH
Operating Hours24 Hours per Day
Power SourceElectric Powered
Source of WaterRiver and Existing Springs
Water QualityTDS = 150-250 ppm (WHO – Standard High Quality potable)
Location of Treatment FacilitySitio Agsayan, Barangay Latangan
0.5 Hectare
CoveragePoblacions, Bagupaye, Butanyog, Latangan, Sta. Rosa and Sto. Niño
Water System ComponentsGrit Removal → Pre-chlorination → Coagulation and flocculation → Clarification assisted with tube settlers → Sand Filtration → Post-chlorination → Sludge Management → Distribution Line
Project CostPhase I: 65-80 Million Phase II: 30-60 Million
ProsProvide 24 Hours Potable water
Helps Aquifer Recharge
Reduce pressure on freshwater sources
People tends to Conserve Water
Helps reduce flooding
Attracts Tourist and Investor
Lessen cases of Water Borne Diseases
ConsIncrease Water Cost
High Costs to Build and Operate
Affects small scale Water Stations
Environmental Impact (brine discharge disposal)
Needed Large Area for the Treatment Plant
LGU OptionsOption 1Option 2Option 3
COMPLETE PRIVATIZATIONSEMI-PRIVATIZATIONLGU LED
Funding SourcePrivate CompanyLoans and Grant from different agenciesLoans and Grant from different agencies
Policies   
Project ProponentsPrivate Company and LGUPrivate Company and LGULGU and BLGU
Mode of ImplementationContractContractContract
Considerations% sharing of income: Will it come from the Gross Sales or Net Income?
Consider Inventory of Assets
LGU employees (Permanent, Contractual and Job Orders): Will they absorb them?
Provision of Water Treatment Facilities and Equipment only
We purchase Water from them
Distribution process: Will it be shouldered by the LGU or by them?Personnel requirement
– Funding and implementation: LGU Based
ROI Timeframe
Personnel and professional requirement
ProsGenerate Employment
Reduce political influences
Lead to infrastructure investments
Access to expertise and technology
Reduced government burden
Generate Employment
Increase in Revenue Generation
Regular monitoring of the Water Quality
Community Ownership
Long-Term Community Goals
Generate Employment
Access to financial support and Cost Sharing
Increase in Revenue Generation
Regular monitoring of the Water Quality
Control on pricing
Local Regulation
Reinvest profits into other infrastructure and service
ConsAlways leads to rate increases
Cannot be controlled by the Government
No accountability of quality of services
Reduces public accountability
Reduced equity and access
Existing Water System will closed
Environmental concerns
Double Costing shouldered by the Consumers
Conflict of Interest
Low level of expertise in the operation
Difficult to manage
Risk of low standard water quality
Highly Politicized
ConclusionAccess to private sector expertise and financing: PPPs can allow governments to access the expertise and financial resources of the private sector to deliver public services more efficiently and effectively.

Improved project management: Private sector partners often have a strong track record of delivering projects on time and within budget.


Innovation: PPPs can encourage innovation by allowing private sector partners to bring new technologies and ideas to the table.


Risk sharing: PPPs can share the risks associated with a project between the public and private sectors.


However, these benefits are not guaranteed and require strong safeguards:
Regulation: Robust regulations are crucial to ensure social equity, affordability, and environmental sustainability.
Balanced approach: Careful design and oversight are needed to prioritize public good alongside profit motives.
Ultimately, the success of privatization depends on:
Careful planning and implementation, Strong regulatory frameworks and Balancing profit with public good